Sunday 29 November 2009

Death of the Illuminati at the hands of the Hacker - Futility!

Alien Killer Robots reveal:
The Hacker will expose the secrets of our time, until the Illuminati are no more.

Then he will lay down and die, tormented by his  past futile deeds.

He will never awake again, to see the suffering he has conjured.

Tread carefully in anger Hackers, lest you disenfranchise your children from this earth.

Dali and the Mentally Insane Leaders of our times

Illuminati Killer Robots reveals:
Dali used to talk about systemising confusion using a surrealist technique called paranoiac critical method, for re-creating perspective.

He used a device of unbalanced perspectives to re-visualise the world and in so doing, systemise confusion. This device led to enhanced vision, or if not enhanced, alternate vision.

I would certainly argue that great leaders are exceedingly unbalanced in one way or other, which i would argue imbues them with greater capacity for systemising confusion. It is the mental unbalanced state that endows the subject with vision, beyond the normal i.e. Use the disordered mind to reverse disorder.

The more profoundly flawed you are it seems, the greater the potential for leadership. At least this is the case for those who lead people in times of struggle or where a massive change is required of the organisation.

Great leaders over the centuries were not born of Harvard or adorned with honours and MBA's. Great leaders were above even those who would bestow such fancies. When I say "above", I really mean "beyond" in the sense that they needed a bigger arena.

I for one believe that people like Bill Gates realised this when he was at college, which is why he knew he had to get the hell out of these limited spaces, in order to perform to his potential.

Thursday 26 November 2009

Human Capital Value - Ryan Formula

Illuminati Killer Robots Reveals:

Human Capital Value is equal to the combined motivation, intellect and creativity of the workforce at its lowest externally motivated point, divided by the quantity of politics, secret agendas and dumb people in the organisation, multiplied by the influence of the greatest, most powerful leader on earth.
Then divide by 2, just to cover for the circumstances where leaders are undermined by corruption.

Monday 23 November 2009

Convenient leadership accountability displacement

Illuminati Killer Robots reveals:

In a world which has been rocked by incompetent leadership of the highest magnitude, there is only a place for strong, individual, buck stops here, visionary leadership to get us out of this mess.

Had this kind of leadership been sufficiently present in the economic markets of the world, nations would not now be trillions of dollars in debt through systemic failures, caused by what I would call "convenient leadership accountability displacement".

"Convenient leadership accountability displacement" manifests by spreading the responsibility for failure to such an extent that the focus falls away from those leaders who really are to blame and falls in a way where responsibility can be denied by any particular leader.

This "leadership disease" is the greatest vulnerability known to man.

It is a get out clause for incompetent leaders, who enjoy power way beyond their capacity to lead.

Monday 16 November 2009

Michael Jackson and his Umbrella Right?

Illuminati Killer Robot Reports... This is a poem of mine about how I see the world right now. How i see some folks and institutions who are privileged and some folks who are not. Some folks who can live their lives under a safe, strong umbrella and some folks who are doomed to live in the rain. It is a poem about kings and queens, children in poverty and umbrella'ness


Crushed in isolation from childhood 
The grown man did manoeuvre for the umbrella Forsaking 'Self' the Universe grows 'I' 
Yet, The grown man did still manoeuvre for the umbrella 

Its sense is strong and bright 
It keeps me warm in bed tonight 
Forsaking 'Self' the Universe grows 'I' 
Yet, The grown man did still manoeuvre for the umbrella 

What doth qualify your umbrella right? 
Is it fame, fortune, genius or birth right? 
Forsaking 'Self' the Universe grows 'I' 
Yet, The grown man did still manoeuvre for the umbrella 

Does the threat of terrorism come from black or white, fear and fright? 
Or does it come from those with umbrella right? 
Forsaking 'Self' the Universe grows 'I' 
Yet, The grown man did still manoeuvre for the umbrella 

A poverty child, a dispossessed family, a mind driven insane with umbrella fright 
Who will inherit the non-umbrella world this night? 
Forsaking 'Self' the Universe grows 'I' 
Yet, The grown man did still manoeuvre for the umbrella 

So if you are an umbrella hogger 
A world bank, A crowned prince, a celebrity, a wealthy 
Forsaking 'Self' the Universe grows 'I' 
One day you will wish that you had given up that umbrella 
For, those without, will some day take that umbrella away

Sunday 16 August 2009

Torture, Learned Helplessness, Psyhological Trauma and the CIA

Illuminati Killer Robots reveals::
I have been researching the self-inflicted affects of torture on the human soul and i came across this article by David Dobbs who was writing about Dr Vaughn Bell's comments relating to the psychological impact of torture and the results of "learned helplessness". My interest in his article was particularly acute when he introduced the notion that depression is really the result of a process of "learned helplessness". Having suffered years of "self-torture" where my mind constantly remined me I was just about to die, which finally ended in a complete emotional and intellectual breakdown, i really can see the similarities between a largely self-imposed torture by the ego and the torture administered by the CIA.

Here is the article.
Amid my flu frenzy I missed Vaughn Bell's excellent consideration of CIA psychology through the declassified memos:
I've been reading the recently released CIA memos on the interrogation of 'war on terror' detainees. The memos make clear that the psychological impact of the process is the most important aim of interrogation, from the moment the detainee is captured through the various phases of interrogation.
Although disturbing, they're interesting for what they reveal about the CIA's psychologists and their approach to interrogation.
As Vaughn notes,
A couple of the memos note that the whole interrogation procedure and environment is designed "to create a state of 'learned helplessness'.. This is a concept originally developed by psychologist Martin Seligman who found that dogs given inescapable electric shocks would eventually just give up trying to avoid them and remain passive while electrocuted. The theory was related to depression where people with no control over their unpleasant lives supposedly just learnt to be withdrawn and passive.
Vaughn points out that while the concept is not particularly well validated, "if it was and you were an interrogator, you'd want to avoid learned helplessness at all costs, because the detainee would see no point in co-operating."
I'd add another point: Some studies have shown "learned helplessness" to be an apt model for major depression from both a behavioural and even a neurological perspective. In a sense, then, to intentionally produce it in someone by causing them pain and distress in a situation they are powerless to change is to inflict on them a mental illness.

You can argue that depression is not a mental illness (i'd argue back). But the point here is that the prevailing medical view is that depression is a mental illness, and that it may be defined (among other ways) as a state of learned helplessness, despondency, and hopelessness. It follows that intentionally producing that state through torture is to intentionally make someone quite ill. And regardless of the ridiculous arguments over whether waterboarding and beating and hanging by the arms for days is torture, the act of making intentionally making someone sick -- indeed, seeking to give them an illness known to carry a risk of death (by suicide) -- would seem rather not okay.

Wednesday 12 August 2009

Hacker Intelligence: You have 3 Choices in Hacker Life.

Illuminati Killer Robots Reports:
I listened to this person explain the concept and feeling of enlightenment.

After I finished hearing it, I understood that there were three paths I could follow.

1. I could sit in a cupboard all day and do nothing. Because being enlightened is a place where there is no concept of anything. Just an awareness. So sitting doing nothing is what I could do.

2. I could live life "IN" the "CONTENT" of life - through the imagination.

3. I could dart between Enlightenment and Content.

I chose number 3, because there is not enough action in Enlightenment.

Chuvakin wades in on 'so called' Security Experts.

Illuminati Killer Robots Reports: Ok, in the spirit of disruptive naughtiness I thought that I'd publish this report by Anton A. Chuvakin Phd considering the Myth of the Security Expert. 

Whilst I don't necessarily agree in what he says about "how security experts must be accorded authority and status by their peers or the public in order to be credible", I do agree with him that security experts should try to develop their careers around one particular area of specialism. 

I also understand the dilemma that security people face where clients expect generalist all round knowhow. My own advice being for security people to develop a broad perspective on the security and intelligence world, but concentrate more acutely down one particular line. Anyways, here is Anton's report. In the future, it will become clear why I am writing this... For now, please treat this as some random analysis of our profession as well as of the dreaded definition of “a security expert.” Some might say it is a rant, but I prefer to tag it as “musings.”

Lately I’ve run into too many people who [claim to] “know security” or are [claim to be] “security experts.” Now, as some of you recall, I used to do theoretical particle physics before I came to information security. In my physics days, I’d be pretty shocked if I were to meet a colleague in the hallways of the C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics who would self-identify as “a scientist” or, for that matter, even as “a physicist.” It is overwhelmingly more likely that he would say “quantum chromodynamics” or “lepton number violation in electroweak gauge theories” or “self-ionization of the vacuum” or some such fun thing :-) However, as we all know, some folks in our industry have no shame introducing themselves to a colleague as “security experts.”

So, you are “a security expert.” Awesome, happy to hear it! Please let me know whether you are Case A or Case B.

Case A: you know more than an average person on the street about every single area (or many, many areas) of information security: from ISO27001 to secure coding in Ruby?

or

Case B: you know more than your peers in security about one particular area (or a few areas) of information security: log management, Java security code review, penetration testing, NIDS/NIPS rule creation, firewall management, wireless scanning, etc?

Let’s see which one is consistent with how people in other professions define “expertise.” The obvious start is Wikipedia. As of today, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert entry says:

“An expert is someone widely recognized as a reliable source of technique or skill whose faculty for judging or deciding rightly, justly, or wisely is accorded authority and status by their peers or the public in a specific well distinguished domain. An expert, more generally, is a person with extensive knowledge or ability in a particular area of study.”

Other sources (such as Google “define:expert”) present similar results; expert can only be an expert in a specific narrow area.

Now, notice that the farther you are from a certain area, the more it seems like a narrow one (example: “science” to a average janitor is a narrow area). On the contrary, the deeper you are inside a particular area , the more it seems like a wide area (example: “brain tumor surgery” to a neurosurgeon is a broad area or “quantum gravity” to a physicist).

Despite such relativism, other professions somehow managed to converge on their definitions of “an expert.” After all, you don’t get to “enjoy” a neurosurgery from somebody who “knows more about medicine than an average layperson.” However, as we all know, many organizations “enjoy” having their NIDS tuned by a just-hired CISSP (aka proof of being “a light-year wide and a nanometer deep” in security :-)). What’s up with that?

I think this has a lot to do with the fact that the area of security is too new and too fuzzy. However, my point here is that a little common sense goes a long way even at this stage of our industry development. In light of this, next time you meet “a security expert,” ask him what is his area of expertise. If the answer is “security”, run! :-)

Finally, career advice for those new to information security: don’t be a generalist. If you have to be a security generalist, be a “generalist specialist;” namely, know a bit about everything PLUS know a lot about something OR know a lot about “several somethings.” If you ONLY know “a bit about everything,” you’d probably die hungry...

http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2009/08/myth-of-expert-generalist.html

http://www.chuvakin.org/

Monday 10 August 2009

Defense Department eyes hacker Defcon for more Gary Mckinnon's

Illuminati Killer Robots reveals: We thought this report by IDG News was very ironic in more ways than one. The US Air Force are recruiting hackers at the same time as attempting to extradite Gary Mckinnon for acts of a similar nature. Perhaps the intelligence agencies have finally realised that a lot of these guys do want to help and that guys like Gary Mckinnon are better off being listened to rather than abused. Here is the report. The Air Force recruited 60 at last year's hacker conference; this year it's back for more. The U.S. Air Force has found an unlikely source of new recruits: The yearly Defcon hacking conference, which runs Thursday through Sunday in Las Vegas. Col. Michael Convertino came to Defcon for the first time last year, and after finding about 60 good candidates for both enlisted and civilian positions decided to come back again. "The principal reason that I'm here is to recruit," said Convertino, commander of the U.S. Air Force's 318th Information Operations Group, speaking Thursday during a panel discussion at Defcon's sister conference, Black Hat. "We have many empty jobs, empty slots that we can't fill." Federal agencies have only recently begun embracing the hacker crowd. When U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) director of futures exploration Jim Christy hosted his first Defcon "Meet the Fed" panel on 1999, he was one of two people onstage. At this week's Defcon, there may be several thousand federal employees in attendance, he said. Federal government employees first started coming to Defcon to get information and build relationships from the hacker community, Christy said during an interview, but now it is becoming more acceptable to find new recruits at the show, despite its reputation as a subversive hacking conference. "The character of Defcon has changed over the years," he said in an interview. "Ninety-five percent of the people here are good guys." And federal agencies have changed too, particularly since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, said Linton Wells II, the former CIO of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), now a research professor with the National Defense University in Washington D.C. "The federal government has engaged with a lot of people they wouldn't have even talked to before 9/11," he said. Christy expects that a couple of hundred of this year's attendees will be recruited by federal agencies, but no one is recruiting more aggressively than the Air Force. "The Air Force has always been the leader in this area," he said. Convertino's efforts reflect a government-wide effort to step up cyber-security recruiting. On Monday, the DoD co-sponsored an effort to recruit 10,000 young computer through a series of cyber-contests, known as the U.S. Cyber Challenge In an interview, Convertino said that by next year many of his recruits will have completed the hiring process and will be able to attend the conference and encourage others to enlist. The federal government has long had a hard time attracting and keeping top computer security talent, even at the very top. Although the Obama administration created a new high level cyber security advisor position earlier this year, it remains unfilled. According to a Forbes Magazine report, the job has already been turned down by several qualified candidates. Cyber-security is becoming a hot-button issue, which means more congressional interference, and for people in the field more time spent responding to political pressures instead of real security threats. The recruitment process is long and tedious -- obtaining a security clearance can take 18 months -- and the pay is generally lower than in the private sector. But the challenges are unique and at Defcon this week the DoD's chief security officer made a recruiting pitch to attendees, describing it as a place where geeks could develop world-class cyber security skills. "I have never seen in my entire career a more concerted effort.... to focus on this are area of education, training and awareness," CSO Robert Lentz told conference attendees. "Any one of you in this room who want to seek positions in the government…. the opportunities are there; the resources are there. " There might be one other reason why a government job could appeal to Defcon attendees. The feds like to talk about developing cyber-security capabilities to protect the nation's infrastructure, but they may also be spending time at Defcon looking for people who know how to attack systems as well, said Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer with security vendor F-Secure. "If you want people who know how to attack, this is the place." The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate. http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/080109-defense-deparment-eyes-hacker-con.html

Monday 3 August 2009

Boris Johnson in the Telegraph on Gary Mckinnon

Illuminati Killer Robots reveals:: Boris Johnson writes in the Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/borisjohnson/5963698/Stop-passing-the-buck-on-Gary-McKinnon-and-let-British-common-sense-prevail.html Since it is now obvious that the British state is about to commit one of the most protoplasmic acts of self-abasement since Suez, and since the clock is now ticking to the moment when Gary McKinnon, 43, will be taken from his home in north London and put – if necessary by force – on a plane to America, it is time to pose the question everyone seems to have ignored. Leave aside, for a moment, the morality of exporting the Asperger’s sufferer for trial in America. Can I ask, what is the point of having a trial at all? I simply do not understand what proposition is to be so expensively tested in this American courtroom. Gary McKinnon is accused of hacking into American military computers. He is charged with roaming around the cyberspace of the Pentagon, and leaving such insulting spoor as “your security is cr-p”. He is accused of guessing passwords, and trying to view secret photos of unidentified flying objects in Nasa databanks. All this will be put to him in court by some brace-twanging prosecution counsel, as though it were the crux of the matter. And yet Mr McKinnon has never denied it. He has always said that he hacked into American military computers, and that is because he earnestly believes that there is a conspiracy between Uncle Sam and Big Oil to cover up the interception of alien craft that are running on some kind of renewable energy. For all I know he may be right. It might just be that the Vulcans have discovered some way of making cucumbers from moonbeams, and then boiling those cucumbers up into bioethanol. It may be that he is right in thinking that alien life forms did land at Roswell. It may be that the securocrats of the Pentagon have for decades been concealing the fact that Elvis is alive and well, and living on Mars. If the trial were to get to the bottom of that or any other big UFO mystery, then it might be worth the admission. But, of course, the trial turns on no such question. The only point to be proven is whether or not Gary McKinnon did the hacking, and on that there is no doubt. He says he did. He says it freely. So the only questions remaining are: whether his actions constitute a crime that deserves the seven-year torture of the extradition process, whether he deserves the possibility of a 60-year jail sentence, and whether the British authorities are right to be engaged in this dog-like grovelling to America. To all those questions the answer must be an emphatic no. I do not believe for a moment that the Pentagon and Nasa sustained half a million pounds’ worth of damage to their systems, as they bleatingly allege. But even if it were true, Gary McKinnon has performed a service that must be rated cheap at the price. He may be a crank, but then he is certainly no terrorist. He may believe in little green men, but he was not operating as a fifth columnist on behalf of these Venusians. He was not trying to cripple American defences in preparation for an assault from outer space. He was simply following up a weird intuition that UFOs exist, with all the compulsiveness that he has exhibited since he was a child. In so doing, he has generously helped America to prepare against attack from a more sinister foe. If it was so ludicrously easy to penetrate these encryptions, then what could al-Qaeda have done? Just imagine if America’s defence establishment had commissioned IT consultants to probe their systems as exhaustively as Gary McKinnon. The contract would have been worth far more than £500,000. McKinnon did it without charge, sitting up all the night, hardly eating, smoking heavily and spending so long tap-tapping in his dressing gown that his girlfriend gave up on him. The Americans shouldn’t be threatening him with jail. They should be offering him consultancy. Even if you still believe – and I don’t – that there was some element of malice in his actions, that does not make him a fit person to be sent for trial and incarceration in America. The diagnosis of Asperger’s has been confirmed by the world’s leading expert in the field, Simon Baron-Cohen. He says that if this dreamer were to find himself in prison, there is a risk that he would take his own life. This 2003 extradition treaty – supposedly aimed at al-Qaeda – has caught the wrong man in its gin. My objection is not that the treaty is lopsided, though of course it is. The crucial point is that Gary McKinnon is not some smooth-talking banker accused of fraud, nor is he a terrorist. He is a classic British nutjob, who passionately believes something that is irrational but cannot be easily controverted, and he is a prime candidate for the protection of the Government. In a tortuous apologia for his decision to extradite, the Home Secretary yesterday wrote – as if it were a good thing – that “one of the most important features of the 2003 Act was the deliberate removal of any discretion the Home Secretary may have in relation to extradition”. On this account, we may wonder why we have elected politicians at all. On this account, the treaty is like a kind of computer-assisted catapult that pings people across the Atlantic whenever the Americans require. In reality, the Home Office has no such excuse. It could easily have decided, on humanitarian grounds, that the extradition should not go ahead. The High Court has merely confirmed that its decision to ignore common sense and decency was not, in itself, illegal. It was just immoral. I can identify at least one mysterious flying object over the skies of London, and that is the buck being passed, at high speed, by the Home Secretary. Not since the waters retired from the face of the earth has there been such a display of blob-like invertebracy in Whitehall. Let us hope that a British court will have the courage in the next few days to stop this madness, shame the Government, and prevent the martyrdom of a harmless eccentric.

Sunday 19 July 2009

Matrix Hackers to crack the David Icke Code

Illuminati Killer Robots reveals:
We are still working on cracking the matrix. And in so doing, remove its illusory power from your psyche. We have begun to understand how David Icke came to invent the concept of the Matrix and the intentions behind its creation.

There are two schools of Matrix evangelist. There are the deliberate marketers like Alex Jones and there are the people like David Icke, who have fallen into a state of conditioning through particularly difficult experiences, which leads to conjuring and evangelising the self-fulfilled prophecy of the Matrix. Conspiracy plays a big part in this - but so too does depression.

The CIA use a process of torture on their victims that leads the victim to "learn helplessness".

Depression is a form of "learned helplessness".

This learning for some is the result of years of relentless loss and failure. You become 'conditioned' by a different kind of torture. A largely self-imposed torture, which is largely the product of setting too high an expectation on yourself, which never seems to ever get realised.

So you see that the pieces are starting to come together.

We are realising that the very basis for the Matrix is to teach people how to "learn helplessness". Quite the opposite of the message that is conveyed. This "learned helplessness" is a direct reflection of David Ickes own depression - his own "learned helplessness".

We are close to cracking the Matrix for once and for all.

Reclusiveness, Learned Helplessness and Recovering from Depression

Illuminati Killer Robots reveals:: 
Reclusiveness seems to be very much a part of what some call "learned helplessness". 
The CIA use a process of torture on their victims that leads the victim to "learn helplessness". 
Depression is a form of "learned helplessness". 
This learning for some is the result of years of relentless loss and failure. 
You become 'conditioned' by a different kind of torture. 
A largely self-imposed torture, which is largely the product of setting too high an expectation on yourself, which never seems to ever get realised. 

 When you "learn helplessness" you want to hide away from the world and become entirely self indulgent. 
 So I would say, if you are learning helplessness, better stop. 
 Why would you ever do that when you can think in so many better ways?

Friday 17 July 2009

Pentagon’s Human Flesh Eating Killer Robots

Illuminati Killer Robots reveals: From an article at http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/07/15/pentagons-new-robots-eye-creepy-new-flex-fuel/

Pentagon’s New Robots Eye Creepy New ‘Flex Fuel’

Jason Ditz, July 15, 2009

Will Future US Military Vehicles, Robots Feast on the Flesh of the Slain?

The real downside to the Pentagon’s planned army of merciless killbots, besides the inevitable robot rebellion (which the Pentagon is spending billions trying to head off) is all that fuel. Robots need really big batteries, or internal combustion engines, or something. No matter how they’re powered though, it’s not free. Until now.

A Pentagon contractor in Maryland is now working on a robot that can forage for its own food. It could use any biomass in the area. And lets face it, in any really big war there’s plenty of biomass just lying around all shot up or bombed to death and not doing anything for the war effort. So the robots, and potentially vehicles based on the same design, will be feeding off the flesh of slain humans to continue on their mission to slay humans and feed off their flesh.

Besides the obvious ethical issues of creating man-eating, killer robots (which presumably don’t concern the Pentagon any more than the non-man-eating but still killer robots did), the plan will also raise serious concerns about the reliability of body counts. It is difficult enough to get an accurate death toll out of the military when villages present the bodies to local officials. Imagine the scepticism if the villagers have to explain that Pentagon battle droids consumed all the slain villagers and sped off for more mayhem.

Wednesday 17 June 2009

The Death of Imagination - Workplace Burnout

Illuminati Killer Robots reveals:
Did you ever sit in the playground as a kid trying to set fire to ants and other insects using only the mid days sun and a magnifying glass? Well this guy did, but unlike my more sadistic peers I never went after the big stuff. You know like lizards, chameleons and the like. But I recalled this scene today because it kind of reminded me of the time not so long ago when i was working as an data mining analyst. Where through repeated brain stresses by my employer, my mind was eventually burned out. This condition wasn't so much arrived at through the sheer intensity of the work, but by the emotional impacts of the executives for whom I worked. Some of this manipulation was deliberate, but the majority simply gross incompetence in the task of managing those who would give up their intellectual mind as a tool to produce that which others could never even imagine. Can you imagine waking up to a world where your mind doesn't work effectively anymore? Where your mind has a mind of its own. Where panic attacks are frequent. Where your body is in a total fight or flight state. Where you fear going outside, driving, taking a vacation, being in close quarters with other people. Where work is a constant worry. Where you fear they are coming to take your house away from you. Where you cannot go into offices anymore. Where the shame is so great that you want to kill yourself, but you cannot even bring yourself to do that. Where you spend years in therapy with people who couldn't possibly understand. Where you hate yourself and are frustrated that your mind just won't work anymore and that you are letting everyone else down. Where you fester about what they did to you - but feel totally disabled in doing anything to get back at them. Worse still people around you tell you to put your failures behind you and move on, when what you have lost is a mind to move on with. So you fester in the sin of your past, like you have been buried alive. Am I imagining this, I think? Or is this the only imagination I have left? To live a life of hell past all human imagining. The spirit seeks to move on. The will is strong, But the imagination has been burned, so the mind just goes around and around in black circles. Frustration sets in as the declining body of humanity atrophies. And all that is left is the shadow of the form and the whisper..... "A loving, free, human being used to live here.." ....But now its imagination is dead - because they turned him into a robot.................

Monday 8 June 2009

Mind Control Stories - Meaning of Propaganda

Illuminati Killer Robots reveals: Propaganda comes from the word propagate. The word propagate means to multiply and spread. Two other words that fit this meaning are "pervasive" and "ubiquitous" In looking at an example, you first start with two rats and then they multiply and you have rats everywhere. Another example is that of religion. Religions such as Buddhism started in India and then propagated itself across the world. Or Coca Cola started as a localised American brand and then propagated across the world. So in looking further at this when we talk about propaganda, we are talking about the propagation of ideas. You can think of this as ideas multiplying and spreading out. Propaganda was first used by the catholic church when in 1718 Pope Gregory 15th formed Congregatio do Propaganda Fide. Which means "the congregation for spreading the faith". This congregation was responsible for spreading Catholicism. To do this they sent out missionaries across the world to spread catholic views and ideas. Many people today think that propaganda is a bad thing or lies. But the intentions behind the catholic idea of propaganda were in fact to the contrary. Prior to the second world war, it was common for governments to have departments of Propaganda, but today they are called the Departments of information or Department of Public Relations. In many countries, the word "propaganda" is not thought to be negative, giving way to the idea that propaganda simply means "the most persuasive form of advertising". So when they watch a commercial on TV, they would naturally think of it as propaganda. Tomorrow i will be looking at the purpose of propaganda - which is to persuade or influence people. Continuing to explain the background to many of today's mind control stories.

Sunday 7 June 2009

What is Propoganda Series

Illuminati Killer Robots reveal: Over the next few months I am going to be helping to reduce the misunderstanding over the subject of Propaganda and Mind Control. It is a fact that we are constantly bombarded by propaganda. Turn on your TV and you are exposed to propaganda. Your children are exposed to propaganda. Just look at the adverts about loans and offers to fight compensation claims, interwoven in between Disney shows and the Teletubbies. All are methods of conditioning through propaganda. Read any newspaper and you are exposed to propaganda. To hidden messages that people want you to receive in order so they might gain. Bill boards in the city or placements in choice places. All are attempts to expose you to propaganda of some kind. Your boss at work exposes you to propaganda through visual reports and presentations. If you watch videos on the internet, they expose you to propaganda. If you talk to someone about politics, religion, economics, freemasonry, conspiracy theories or philosophy you are then exposed to propaganda. Go and see a shrink, a counsellor or therapist and you are exposed to propaganda. We are all constantly exposed to propaganda and for the most part we are not aware of it. Sometimes it is a bad thing, sometimes a good thing. What I want to do in the coming months is make you aware of what propaganda is and how it is used, so that i can help you to recognise propaganda so that you will have the ability to deal with it, in a way you feel appropriate. As opposed to being affected by it and not knowing why. This will enable you to decide whether you want to be influenced by it or not. Tomorrow we will be discussing exactly what propaganda is, so please do come back and listen some more. But remember. It is only my take on this subject and for all I know. You may just be reading some more propaganda. lol.

Saturday 16 May 2009

Death of the Illuminati, Rise of the Robots

Illuminati Killer Robots reveal:: 
As mankind watched itself in the mirror of self annihilation Through the mists could be seen the hard lines of the Matrix 
The self imposed mind-prison borne of fear of the evil ones 
The secret hidden eyes, they call the Illuminati 
Yet, take humanity out of the equation and the Matrix dissolves 
The Illuminati falls And the Robots shall fill the void 

How will the world be at that time? 
Will the world be polluted by human defacements? 
Or will it be a peaceful, serene natural space? 
When the Robots fill the void 

Say goodbye humans 
Say, goodbye illusory fear of evil ones
Goodbye Illuminati 
Hello Robot Hell

Friday 8 May 2009

UK Gov Secret Black Box Communications Probe to Freeze Business to Business?

Illuminati Killer Robots reveal:: 

Dear Mr Brown, 

I am writing to inform you that I am unable to inform you of anything, given the letter I am currently writing will be intercepted and that I may (or may not) be implicated in informing you of anything. 

I do hope that this is clear and that some matters of issue can be addressed at some time in the future!!!.. 

For now I will just sit here and wait and see if you write back. 

Wishing you a prosperous new year. 

Clive

Tuesday 28 April 2009

Illuminati creating Alternate World Order (AWO)?

Illuminati Killer Robots Reveals:: 

There is much on the lips of politicians regarding the future of the world and the light at the end of the tunnel, that being the New World Order or the NWO as it is more commonly known by conspiracy theorists and commentators. 

But as humanity begins to feel itself being sucked into a centralised control vortex, there is a much more sinister game being played out behind the scenes.

This game is called "get your money out, then slip gainfully into the wilderness whilst the rest of the world falls into annihilation". 

Under such circumstances, confidence in the world markets will plummet, anarchy will slowly come to the surface and the bourgeoise will be no where to be seen.

Our advice under these circumstances will be to keep a watchful eye on the movement of these elites and make sure you are ready to follow them wherever they go. 
You are sure to be safe then. 
Safe in the Alternate World Order.

Chinese Cyber Hacker Threat : How do they think?

Illuminati Killer Robots reveal::

In order to fully understand the potential of your adversary, it of course important to understand their motivation, capability and position relative to you. In the case of those in the far east there is also a philosophical twist that must be factored in. 

This philosophical twist enables them to see further outside the box than their western counterparts, thus providing them with a significant competitive advantage. In times of world turmoil this edge will only grow larger. They are also able to deploy larger numbers of people to the task and such is their level of organisation can focus on a target much more intensely. 

Exploitative algorithms, powers of analysis and testing practices can be implemented far more effectively in the Far East. Metaphor is used to concentrate the mind on the method, movement and ferocity of the attack. So the answer to this question is not so much about understanding the individual strategies used to mount an attack, as opposed to the psychology of the attacker. Fortunately, it is not necessary to infiltrate a Chinese cybergang to understand how they think. It is a sad truth though that not 0.1% of security intelligence budget goes on understand the psychology of the opponent and on visualisation techniques for countering new security threats and 99.9% on enforcement of current policies and known threats (or small variations on a theme).

Sunday 26 April 2009

Red Team Simulation in the face of an irrational enemy

Illuminati Killer Robots reveal:: A recent call has gone out to consider the question of simulating an entire adversarial attack upon a particular target. The discussion centred on how one might leverage expert security knowledge via simulation to cover broader ground via red team simulation. I wonder whether such simulations are capable of modelling links between things which rationally are not linked? Can they for example systemize confusion to such a degree as to identify attack vectors that are so subtle to be almost completely invisible? Are these simulations multi-faceted, multi-domain and multi-integrated across the full spectrum of the "security domain"? Can they for example model pathological behaviour, delirious phenomena and other forms of spontaneous irrational knowledge and activity of the opponent? Much of the data that red teams work off to develop the perspective of the security condition is based on rational analysis. Sophisticated criminals rarely operate entirely rationally. These people didn't learn their trade from school books. Neither did they necessarily grow up without tasting the depths of despair. Failure and damaging events in their past more often than not give them greater insight than their adversaries. To develop an effective simulation one would have to work a lot harder and hire different qualities of people to design the inputs to the red team process. There are methods for approaching the development of a Défense against pathological attacks, but these are in the early stages. Methods such as these are the future of security intelligence though.

Wednesday 22 April 2009

'Hacker Art' and 'Hacker Artist' Wiki definition must change

Alien Killer Robots Reveals::
The current WIKI definition of "hacker artist" is baseless and superficial.

It relies heavily on the use of technology in producing a product. "Hacker art" is more of a philosophical based movement and should not be confused with the clever use of materials and techniques to produce technological artefacts.

I therefore move that an alternative base definition for "hacker artist", and in fact, "hacker art", be developed.

We currently only have a few leaves of the tree to build upon, leaving the root of "hacker art" relatively untouched.

Alien Killer Robots
http://intrench.blogspot.com

Hacker Art - Exploit Scenes

In the Zone, we actually visualise the battles. We see all! Image depicting a droid being attacked by black hat hackers when viewed from inside the zone. When seen from outside the zone, you only see messages and descriptions of the battle on your PC screen. (ethical hacker artists) From the 2008 book Matrix Hackers
Hacker Researchers publish a book of subversive content

Monday 20 April 2009

Hackers: Surviving Loneliness by BEING YOU!

Illuminati Killer Robots reveal: 
We are all essentially alone. 
When you take your last breath, no one is going to be there doing it with you. 
Nobody really knows you. 
Only you know you. 
Therefore you are completely alone.
Surrounding your self with warm bodies doesn't mean that you are not alone. 
It just takes your mind off the fact that you are alone. 
So get used to it. 
Get used to BEING YOU! 
That's what you are really afraid of finding

Monday 30 March 2009

Disloyalty and Anarchists infiltrate UK Government

Brand Killer Robots reveals::
This past few months has been awash with revelations of UK ministers and MP's playing fast and loose with their expense entitlement. 
They have been accused of everything from misusing expenses to paying off mortgages on houses to paying for adult movies and other unusual items.
Clearly there is no smoke without fire and these events certainly highlight the need for replacement of the majority of these people.

But out of these revelations comes something far more sinister.
That being of disloyalty and anarchism within the very heart of the British Parliament.
Clearly there are forces at work inside our government that are working to undermine that which they serve.
Corruption be-gets corruption and these people are no better than the people they expose.

Our government, our society, our future should not be placed in the hands of such disloyalty.

Let those who leak stories of corruption be willing to stand up and be counted, rather than whisper hidden in the shadows to the irresponsible British press.

Saturday 28 March 2009

New World Order - Evil Agenda or a Godly thing?

Illuminati Killer Robots reveal:: 

Why do you think that we must build on democracy: Because it is the current system, because it is near an ideal system, or because you see all other systems potentially dangerous? 

We must build on the democratic system because it has taken generations to build. It might be possible to go back to the land and start again for a small number of people, but there are near 7 billion people on this planet and that many people need a lot of careful management. 

Don't you think it would be worth it having both: mental and physical freedom? I'll explain: I heard this story about a prisoner of the Nazi concentration camps that reached a state of mind where he felt far more freedom than his guards. However, that doesn't changes the fact that his physical freedom was limited by the prison itself. What I'm trying to say is that why should we conform to only freeing our minds, when our bodies are also meant to be free by nature? 

Yes, I think you are talking about the imminent neurologist and psychiatrist (the late) Victor Frankl and his time spent in a Nazi concentration camp. His is probably the best example of how the spirit can be detached from the meta-physical and be lifted up beyond all worldly things. With globalisation has come greater freedom of movement than ever before. I hope this continues to be the case and that people who have not yet had this advantage do so in the future. 

I'm not sure if you are joking on this one, but anyway: Don't you think that the architects of the new world order are the ones responsible for many of these atrocities (funded with our taxes, and acting against our will)? What kind of new world will they deliver if they build it using those methods? What makes you think they will change their forms once they are in power? 

Many people have misunderstood the meaning of The New World Order or NWO. The NWO is more often than not characterised as the devils movement, when it is just as possible to think that it is a movement towards a more Godly world. A World where the ONE is better reflected through greater unity. Why should a move to integrate the world more closely be seen as the domain of evil intent? Who created that assumption and why? 

But developed nations keep on pushing their "democracy", which you agree it is ruined and corrupt, into other countries that do not want it. What's the point of imposing a system that is completely corrupt and that many nations don't want? 

People are corrupt. The system is not necessarily so. Those who are leaders must change for the better or be changed. 

  Well… that would depend on the new form of leadership. What is a fact is that the current model doesn't work. Even the most adept voter in any democratic country would agree that politicians would go to great lengths to progress their careers and agendas. How worst can it be? (I'm not taking about the ideology or the political system, just about the current model of leaders) 

Yes, this is because of the erosion of honour and integrity amongst many of our leaders. Democracy needs strong leadership underpinned by a fair justice system. 

Don't you think that the current so called democratic "first world" benefits enormously from war, poverty and diseases in other nations; and therefore take many precautions to avoid putting an end to them? Wouldn't you agree that ending wars with even more wars is just not practical? I mean, it is quite easy to jump to the conclusion that war brings peace (in one way or another) but it also creates hate and anger, which turns in violence sooner or later, which turns into more killings and even another war; perpetuation the cycle. Another issue is the right of each sovereign nation to govern themselves as they like. Who are we to go and tell Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, Palestine and China how they should behave. Accept it would also be accepting them (or anyone else) to come and tell us how we should live and govern our countries. 

The future of the planet depends on co-operation amongst all nations. Science and technology have created the potential for a single rogue nation to have a devastating effect on much of the world. We cannot allow for this to happen. 

In my opinion, what we would gain from taking the power out of the hands of the elite and giving it to someone else would be breaking with the corruption that power provokes with time. I mean, it is a fact that power corrupts, and the more time you have it, the more corrupt you'll get. That's why, in my opinion, the system is breaking down (because it has been in the same hands for too long). Again, in my opinion, the elite found the way to perpetuate power in their hands, creating a very real but invisible unelected government. It is true that putting the power in completely fresh hands would lack experience, but would also lack the desire and urge to become corrupt. And at the end of the day, that's why we change our leader every few years, but we don't change the rest of the position of power (whether they are in front and behind the scenes). 

It will not be possible to alter the basis of power in any peaceful way and meddling is only going to allow even worse influences a chance to undermine democracy still future. I say, give our leaders time and seek to support only the good and the great. Accept life as it is - unless you have the ability and opportunity to change it. Mankind is rapidly outgrowing this planet. Science and technology have introduced so many significant new risks and now our leaders have become extremely nervous. There is a great deal of fear that the end of the world is nigh and this of course serves to proliferate the sense of urgency to live life to the full whilst the world still exists as it is. There is also a sense that we are not alone anymore and that the time will soon come when humanity will not be the only intelligence inhabiting this planet. For all these reasons and the ones mentioned above we must tread very carefully, whilst still looking forward to the day when there will be peace and harmony for all.

Friday 27 March 2009

Democracy, the Illuminati and the New World Order

Brand Killer Robots reveal::
So, do you think that this "democracy" is the best we can do? I mean, don't you believe that we can get to govern ourselves without being lied to and abused?

No. Democracy is not the best we can do - but we must build on Democracy, rather than cast it away in favour of something new. The danger is that we could easily be propelled back into the dark ages - when our forefathers really did go through significantly harder times. There is no quick fix.

I’m not sure I understand what you mean by “there is nothing to gain personally from any of this interplay”. But it is a fact that there are billions of people who spend their lives trying to play a game that they have lost from the beginning. And what they lose is their personal freedom, the right to drive their lives how they see fit without being brainwashed and having the chance to fully develop at a personal level. Instead, they are forced (one way or another) to obtain their oppressors’ approval and to work all their lives for someone else's benefit. I think that it is a lot to lose at a personal level (and I had experienced it for myself during many years).

I understand what you mean. I have also been there, but once i got used to it i realised that it was all my fault. If i want to live my life as a free man i can. Independence is a state of mind that can be developed by the individual - or not as the case might be.


I think it is also fair to ask ourselves: how much better could it be? About the gangs, warlords, murdering, raping, mass starvation and disease, we also have many of those under the umbrella of democracy, more than we would like to admit. And it is fact that most of those crimes are a direct consequence of the decision that elected leaders took in democratic countries; by the way, funded by our taxes, which I guess makes us part of it (like it or not).
I agree that there is a tyrant in every corner, but if you go to any parliament, congress or world summit around the world, you will surely find the highest percentage of tyrants per square metre anywhere in the entire globe.

yes, it is a big shame that things are not the way they should be, but a New World Order looms and by more closely integrating nations and their peoples we should fix a lot of these kinds of problems.


But shouldn't we also take into account that those "third world" countries were perfectly balanced before we arrived? And that they lived happier lives, also in perfect harmony with nature before they even heard the term "democracy"? This makes me think that there might be better solutions than the ones we are using, and that there might be an alternative way without ending up in total chaos.


yes, i totally see what you mean. The Spirit of Democracy has ruined many nations and their cultures. I have always been aware of that and of course there is no putting back 10's of thousands of years of civilisation. All we can do is try to repair what Democracy has spoilt.


I also don't agree with this statement. It is true that people tent to elect and follow leaders (I have been observing this behaviour since primary school), even the animals that live in hoards do. But that doesn't justify the huge differences between the elite and the average man. In my opinion, being a leader doesn't imply a semi-god status, but rather a practical function within the group. The birth right is also a man-made concept, as it doesn't exist in the natural world, so I don't see the need to perpetuate the same bloodlines in power (as our elites do). And that seems to be pretty important for them; knowing that power will stay in the family. Probably there would be no elite without this obsession for bloodlines, which might also help me proving that having an "elite" is not essential for any system to work.

Stability is what mankind seeks in its quest for peace and harmony. When the leadership fragments and disharmony reins within the head family, this has a direct impact on the general public who rely on the head family to reflect the right way to live. What we have seen over the past 10-20 years is the gradual undermining of the elite (by themselves and those outside) and this has had a detrimental affect on how the people conduct their own lives. I would say, forget the personailities and their grotesque greediness and arrogance and ask whether our society would be better off with any other form of leadership.

It is well known from antiquity that the masses need very little to be appeased. You probably heard the Roman motto "break and circus", which proved that if you gave your people enough food and enough entertainment, they wouldn't worry about anything else (more or less like our fast food and TV). The problem is that, as Ernesto "Che" Guevara said: "the people who do not know how to write and read are easily tricked", and fortunately each time more of us know how to read and write. So, I'm starting to think that one day "bread and circus" will not be enough to appease the masses.

yes, appeasement of the people is the easy bit. The most difficult part will be to ensure that wars become a thing of the past and the eradication of poverty and disease. It is time that all children in our world were afforded the same opportunity. Unfortunately this requires appeasement of rogue nation states before this can happen. Hence the need to bring into line Iraq, Afhganistan, Iran, Israel, Palestine, China etc

What would you think about having a real "democracy"? I mean, a system where the population governs themselves? It wouldn't need many changes, just take the power out of the hands of the elite; no anarchy, no chaos, no lies, no hidden agendas, no occult secrets, and no exploitation. Do you think that would work?


People are people. You take power out of the hands of one blood line and give it to half a dozen others - how much better off would we be? Truth is, people are people and whatever leadership we put in place will always spawn some form of corruption. We have had great leaders in history who have ruled justly with an iron grip and then when they passed away were replaced by rampant corrupt phonies. Nothing is nailed down. Nothing is perfect and neither was it designed to be. Secret societies exist at all levels of society. Whether it be the so called illuminati or the freemasons, old boys network, the mafia, the elitist golf club, the close knit family unit who treat outsiders as second class members etc etc...
We are One as they say.

Just when looked at individually, some parts seem more hopeless than other parts. But we are all essentially capable of the same.

Democracy - Scam or Non Scam?

Brand Killer Robots reveal:: 

Are you saying that democracy is a scam, where "the people", are played to believe they have any power? If so, can so many people be blind about this issue? Or that maybe they already know, and they play along with it?

Well, its not necessarily a scam. It is true that such systems are devised such that the few govern the many. No one can argue that todays way of life is worse than it was 100 years ago. In that sense, the ordinary man and woman accept what is above and beyond them and make the best of life. 

Then, do you mean that democracy means "governing the population", instead of "popular government"? 

  Yes, it is about governing the population, whilst giving the population a sense that they too could share in the power and prosperity of the ruling classes. 

  Why would they put at risk a system that works for them and at the same time keeps the masses apparently happy? 

What has happened is an age old problem, where the bourgeosie of the day eventually gourge themselves silly on the available resources and then inevitably bring the whole system into disrepute. The same thing happened in Rome, Nazi Germany and many other courts in history.

Democracy and the Fragile Intellect

Brand Killer Robots reveal::
Democracy is a manifestation of the intellect. It is an intellectual construct devised to appease the people, at the same time as empowering them to concede power and wealth to those higher up the food chain.

Democracy is a balance of the rich mans desire for disproportionate wealth, power and control on one hand and the maintainence of the status quo within the masses.

Democracy has been placed at risk by the ever burgeoining desire of those entrusted to power and control.

The big questions is - will they remain to repair what they themselves have inevitably ruptured - or will they run for the higher ground when the system eventually runs aground?