Exposing the alien serpents who exploit humanity through deceptive messaging and hypnotic algorithms
Its about manipulating our sense of who we are so we experience what they want us to experience.
Sunday 29 November 2009
Death of the Illuminati at the hands of the Hacker - Futility!
The Hacker will expose the secrets of our time, until the Illuminati are no more.
Then he will lay down and die, tormented by his past futile deeds.
He will never awake again, to see the suffering he has conjured.
Tread carefully in anger Hackers, lest you disenfranchise your children from this earth.
Dali and the Mentally Insane Leaders of our times
Dali used to talk about systemising confusion using a surrealist technique called paranoiac critical method, for re-creating perspective.
He used a device of unbalanced perspectives to re-visualise the world and in so doing, systemise confusion. This device led to enhanced vision, or if not enhanced, alternate vision.
I would certainly argue that great leaders are exceedingly unbalanced in one way or other, which i would argue imbues them with greater capacity for systemising confusion. It is the mental unbalanced state that endows the subject with vision, beyond the normal i.e. Use the disordered mind to reverse disorder.
The more profoundly flawed you are it seems, the greater the potential for leadership. At least this is the case for those who lead people in times of struggle or where a massive change is required of the organisation.
Great leaders over the centuries were not born of Harvard or adorned with honours and MBA's. Great leaders were above even those who would bestow such fancies. When I say "above", I really mean "beyond" in the sense that they needed a bigger arena.
I for one believe that people like Bill Gates realised this when he was at college, which is why he knew he had to get the hell out of these limited spaces, in order to perform to his potential.
Thursday 26 November 2009
Human Capital Value - Ryan Formula
Human Capital Value is equal to the combined motivation, intellect and creativity of the workforce at its lowest externally motivated point, divided by the quantity of politics, secret agendas and dumb people in the organisation, multiplied by the influence of the greatest, most powerful leader on earth.
Then divide by 2, just to cover for the circumstances where leaders are undermined by corruption.
Monday 23 November 2009
Convenient leadership accountability displacement
In a world which has been rocked by incompetent leadership of the highest magnitude, there is only a place for strong, individual, buck stops here, visionary leadership to get us out of this mess.
Had this kind of leadership been sufficiently present in the economic markets of the world, nations would not now be trillions of dollars in debt through systemic failures, caused by what I would call "convenient leadership accountability displacement".
"Convenient leadership accountability displacement" manifests by spreading the responsibility for failure to such an extent that the focus falls away from those leaders who really are to blame and falls in a way where responsibility can be denied by any particular leader.
This "leadership disease" is the greatest vulnerability known to man.
It is a get out clause for incompetent leaders, who enjoy power way beyond their capacity to lead.
Monday 16 November 2009
Michael Jackson and his Umbrella Right?
Sunday 16 August 2009
Torture, Learned Helplessness, Psyhological Trauma and the CIA
I have been researching the self-inflicted affects of torture on the human soul and i came across this article by David Dobbs who was writing about Dr Vaughn Bell's comments relating to the psychological impact of torture and the results of "learned helplessness". My interest in his article was particularly acute when he introduced the notion that depression is really the result of a process of "learned helplessness". Having suffered years of "self-torture" where my mind constantly remined me I was just about to die, which finally ended in a complete emotional and intellectual breakdown, i really can see the similarities between a largely self-imposed torture by the ego and the torture administered by the CIA.
Here is the article.
Amid my flu frenzy I missed Vaughn Bell's excellent consideration of CIA psychology through the declassified memos:
I've been reading the recently released CIA memos on the interrogation of 'war on terror' detainees. The memos make clear that the psychological impact of the process is the most important aim of interrogation, from the moment the detainee is captured through the various phases of interrogation.As Vaughn notes,
Although disturbing, they're interesting for what they reveal about the CIA's psychologists and their approach to interrogation.
A couple of the memos note that the whole interrogation procedure and environment is designed "to create a state of 'learned helplessness'.. This is a concept originally developed by psychologist Martin Seligman who found that dogs given inescapable electric shocks would eventually just give up trying to avoid them and remain passive while electrocuted. The theory was related to depression where people with no control over their unpleasant lives supposedly just learnt to be withdrawn and passive.Vaughn points out that while the concept is not particularly well validated, "if it was and you were an interrogator, you'd want to avoid learned helplessness at all costs, because the detainee would see no point in co-operating."
I'd add another point: Some studies have shown "learned helplessness" to be an apt model for major depression from both a behavioural and even a neurological perspective. In a sense, then, to intentionally produce it in someone by causing them pain and distress in a situation they are powerless to change is to inflict on them a mental illness.
You can argue that depression is not a mental illness (i'd argue back). But the point here is that the prevailing medical view is that depression is a mental illness, and that it may be defined (among other ways) as a state of learned helplessness, despondency, and hopelessness. It follows that intentionally producing that state through torture is to intentionally make someone quite ill. And regardless of the ridiculous arguments over whether waterboarding and beating and hanging by the arms for days is torture, the act of making intentionally making someone sick -- indeed, seeking to give them an illness known to carry a risk of death (by suicide) -- would seem rather not okay.
Wednesday 12 August 2009
Hacker Intelligence: You have 3 Choices in Hacker Life.
I listened to this person explain the concept and feeling of enlightenment.
After I finished hearing it, I understood that there were three paths I could follow.
1. I could sit in a cupboard all day and do nothing. Because being enlightened is a place where there is no concept of anything. Just an awareness. So sitting doing nothing is what I could do.
2. I could live life "IN" the "CONTENT" of life - through the imagination.
3. I could dart between Enlightenment and Content.
I chose number 3, because there is not enough action in Enlightenment.
Chuvakin wades in on 'so called' Security Experts.
Lately I’ve run into too many people who [claim to] “know security” or are [claim to be] “security experts.” Now, as some of you recall, I used to do theoretical particle physics before I came to information security. In my physics days, I’d be pretty shocked if I were to meet a colleague in the hallways of the C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics who would self-identify as “a scientist” or, for that matter, even as “a physicist.” It is overwhelmingly more likely that he would say “quantum chromodynamics” or “lepton number violation in electroweak gauge theories” or “self-ionization of the vacuum” or some such fun thing :-) However, as we all know, some folks in our industry have no shame introducing themselves to a colleague as “security experts.”
So, you are “a security expert.” Awesome, happy to hear it! Please let me know whether you are Case A or Case B.
Case A: you know more than an average person on the street about every single area (or many, many areas) of information security: from ISO27001 to secure coding in Ruby?
or
Case B: you know more than your peers in security about one particular area (or a few areas) of information security: log management, Java security code review, penetration testing, NIDS/NIPS rule creation, firewall management, wireless scanning, etc?
Let’s see which one is consistent with how people in other professions define “expertise.” The obvious start is Wikipedia. As of today, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert entry says:
“An expert is someone widely recognized as a reliable source of technique or skill whose faculty for judging or deciding rightly, justly, or wisely is accorded authority and status by their peers or the public in a specific well distinguished domain. An expert, more generally, is a person with extensive knowledge or ability in a particular area of study.”
Other sources (such as Google “define:expert”) present similar results; expert can only be an expert in a specific narrow area.
Now, notice that the farther you are from a certain area, the more it seems like a narrow one (example: “science” to a average janitor is a narrow area). On the contrary, the deeper you are inside a particular area , the more it seems like a wide area (example: “brain tumor surgery” to a neurosurgeon is a broad area or “quantum gravity” to a physicist).
Despite such relativism, other professions somehow managed to converge on their definitions of “an expert.” After all, you don’t get to “enjoy” a neurosurgery from somebody who “knows more about medicine than an average layperson.” However, as we all know, many organizations “enjoy” having their NIDS tuned by a just-hired CISSP (aka proof of being “a light-year wide and a nanometer deep” in security :-)). What’s up with that?
I think this has a lot to do with the fact that the area of security is too new and too fuzzy. However, my point here is that a little common sense goes a long way even at this stage of our industry development. In light of this, next time you meet “a security expert,” ask him what is his area of expertise. If the answer is “security”, run! :-)
Finally, career advice for those new to information security: don’t be a generalist. If you have to be a security generalist, be a “generalist specialist;” namely, know a bit about everything PLUS know a lot about something OR know a lot about “several somethings.” If you ONLY know “a bit about everything,” you’d probably die hungry...
http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2009/08/myth-of-expert-generalist.html
Monday 10 August 2009
Defense Department eyes hacker Defcon for more Gary Mckinnon's
Monday 3 August 2009
Boris Johnson in the Telegraph on Gary Mckinnon
Sunday 19 July 2009
Matrix Hackers to crack the David Icke Code
We are still working on cracking the matrix. And in so doing, remove its illusory power from your psyche. We have begun to understand how David Icke came to invent the concept of the Matrix and the intentions behind its creation.
There are two schools of Matrix evangelist. There are the deliberate marketers like Alex Jones and there are the people like David Icke, who have fallen into a state of conditioning through particularly difficult experiences, which leads to conjuring and evangelising the self-fulfilled prophecy of the Matrix. Conspiracy plays a big part in this - but so too does depression.
The CIA use a process of torture on their victims that leads the victim to "learn helplessness".
Depression is a form of "learned helplessness".
This learning for some is the result of years of relentless loss and failure. You become 'conditioned' by a different kind of torture. A largely self-imposed torture, which is largely the product of setting too high an expectation on yourself, which never seems to ever get realised.
So you see that the pieces are starting to come together.
We are realising that the very basis for the Matrix is to teach people how to "learn helplessness". Quite the opposite of the message that is conveyed. This "learned helplessness" is a direct reflection of David Ickes own depression - his own "learned helplessness".
We are close to cracking the Matrix for once and for all.
Reclusiveness, Learned Helplessness and Recovering from Depression
Friday 17 July 2009
Pentagon’s Human Flesh Eating Killer Robots
Pentagon’s New Robots Eye Creepy New ‘Flex Fuel’
Will Future US Military Vehicles, Robots Feast on the Flesh of the Slain?
The real downside to the Pentagon’s planned army of merciless killbots, besides the inevitable robot rebellion (which the Pentagon is spending billions trying to head off) is all that fuel. Robots need really big batteries, or internal combustion engines, or something. No matter how they’re powered though, it’s not free. Until now.
A Pentagon contractor in Maryland is now working on a robot that can forage for its own food. It could use any biomass in the area. And lets face it, in any really big war there’s plenty of biomass just lying around all shot up or bombed to death and not doing anything for the war effort. So the robots, and potentially vehicles based on the same design, will be feeding off the flesh of slain humans to continue on their mission to slay humans and feed off their flesh.
Besides the obvious ethical issues of creating man-eating, killer robots (which presumably don’t concern the Pentagon any more than the non-man-eating but still killer robots did), the plan will also raise serious concerns about the reliability of body counts. It is difficult enough to get an accurate death toll out of the military when villages present the bodies to local officials. Imagine the scepticism if the villagers have to explain that Pentagon battle droids consumed all the slain villagers and sped off for more mayhem.
Wednesday 17 June 2009
The Death of Imagination - Workplace Burnout
Monday 8 June 2009
Mind Control Stories - Meaning of Propaganda
Sunday 7 June 2009
What is Propoganda Series
Saturday 16 May 2009
Death of the Illuminati, Rise of the Robots
Friday 8 May 2009
UK Gov Secret Black Box Communications Probe to Freeze Business to Business?
Tuesday 28 April 2009
Illuminati creating Alternate World Order (AWO)?
Chinese Cyber Hacker Threat : How do they think?
Sunday 26 April 2009
Red Team Simulation in the face of an irrational enemy
Wednesday 22 April 2009
'Hacker Art' and 'Hacker Artist' Wiki definition must change
The current WIKI definition of "hacker artist" is baseless and superficial.
It relies heavily on the use of technology in producing a product. "Hacker art" is more of a philosophical based movement and should not be confused with the clever use of materials and techniques to produce technological artefacts.
I therefore move that an alternative base definition for "hacker artist", and in fact, "hacker art", be developed.
We currently only have a few leaves of the tree to build upon, leaving the root of "hacker art" relatively untouched.
Alien Killer Robots
http://intrench.blogspot.com
Hacker Art - Exploit Scenes
Hacker Researchers publish a book of subversive content
Monday 20 April 2009
Hackers: Surviving Loneliness by BEING YOU!
Monday 30 March 2009
Disloyalty and Anarchists infiltrate UK Government
This past few months has been awash with revelations of UK ministers and MP's playing fast and loose with their expense entitlement.
Clearly there is no smoke without fire and these events certainly highlight the need for replacement of the majority of these people.
But out of these revelations comes something far more sinister.
Clearly there are forces at work inside our government that are working to undermine that which they serve.
Corruption be-gets corruption and these people are no better than the people they expose.
Our government, our society, our future should not be placed in the hands of such disloyalty.
Let those who leak stories of corruption be willing to stand up and be counted, rather than whisper hidden in the shadows to the irresponsible British press.
Saturday 28 March 2009
New World Order - Evil Agenda or a Godly thing?
Friday 27 March 2009
Democracy, the Illuminati and the New World Order
So, do you think that this "democracy" is the best we can do? I mean, don't you believe that we can get to govern ourselves without being lied to and abused?
No. Democracy is not the best we can do - but we must build on Democracy, rather than cast it away in favour of something new. The danger is that we could easily be propelled back into the dark ages - when our forefathers really did go through significantly harder times. There is no quick fix.
I’m not sure I understand what you mean by “there is nothing to gain personally from any of this interplay”. But it is a fact that there are billions of people who spend their lives trying to play a game that they have lost from the beginning. And what they lose is their personal freedom, the right to drive their lives how they see fit without being brainwashed and having the chance to fully develop at a personal level. Instead, they are forced (one way or another) to obtain their oppressors’ approval and to work all their lives for someone else's benefit. I think that it is a lot to lose at a personal level (and I had experienced it for myself during many years).
I understand what you mean. I have also been there, but once i got used to it i realised that it was all my fault. If i want to live my life as a free man i can. Independence is a state of mind that can be developed by the individual - or not as the case might be.
I think it is also fair to ask ourselves: how much better could it be? About the gangs, warlords, murdering, raping, mass starvation and disease, we also have many of those under the umbrella of democracy, more than we would like to admit. And it is fact that most of those crimes are a direct consequence of the decision that elected leaders took in democratic countries; by the way, funded by our taxes, which I guess makes us part of it (like it or not). I agree that there is a tyrant in every corner, but if you go to any parliament, congress or world summit around the world, you will surely find the highest percentage of tyrants per square metre anywhere in the entire globe.
yes, it is a big shame that things are not the way they should be, but a New World Order looms and by more closely integrating nations and their peoples we should fix a lot of these kinds of problems.
But shouldn't we also take into account that those "third world" countries were perfectly balanced before we arrived? And that they lived happier lives, also in perfect harmony with nature before they even heard the term "democracy"? This makes me think that there might be better solutions than the ones we are using, and that there might be an alternative way without ending up in total chaos.
yes, i totally see what you mean. The Spirit of Democracy has ruined many nations and their cultures. I have always been aware of that and of course there is no putting back 10's of thousands of years of civilisation. All we can do is try to repair what Democracy has spoilt.
I also don't agree with this statement. It is true that people tent to elect and follow leaders (I have been observing this behaviour since primary school), even the animals that live in hoards do. But that doesn't justify the huge differences between the elite and the average man. In my opinion, being a leader doesn't imply a semi-god status, but rather a practical function within the group. The birth right is also a man-made concept, as it doesn't exist in the natural world, so I don't see the need to perpetuate the same bloodlines in power (as our elites do). And that seems to be pretty important for them; knowing that power will stay in the family. Probably there would be no elite without this obsession for bloodlines, which might also help me proving that having an "elite" is not essential for any system to work.
Stability is what mankind seeks in its quest for peace and harmony. When the leadership fragments and disharmony reins within the head family, this has a direct impact on the general public who rely on the head family to reflect the right way to live. What we have seen over the past 10-20 years is the gradual undermining of the elite (by themselves and those outside) and this has had a detrimental affect on how the people conduct their own lives. I would say, forget the personailities and their grotesque greediness and arrogance and ask whether our society would be better off with any other form of leadership.
It is well known from antiquity that the masses need very little to be appeased. You probably heard the Roman motto "break and circus", which proved that if you gave your people enough food and enough entertainment, they wouldn't worry about anything else (more or less like our fast food and TV). The problem is that, as Ernesto "Che" Guevara said: "the people who do not know how to write and read are easily tricked", and fortunately each time more of us know how to read and write. So, I'm starting to think that one day "bread and circus" will not be enough to appease the masses.
yes, appeasement of the people is the easy bit. The most difficult part will be to ensure that wars become a thing of the past and the eradication of poverty and disease. It is time that all children in our world were afforded the same opportunity. Unfortunately this requires appeasement of rogue nation states before this can happen. Hence the need to bring into line Iraq, Afhganistan, Iran, Israel, Palestine, China etc
What would you think about having a real "democracy"? I mean, a system where the population governs themselves? It wouldn't need many changes, just take the power out of the hands of the elite; no anarchy, no chaos, no lies, no hidden agendas, no occult secrets, and no exploitation. Do you think that would work?
People are people. You take power out of the hands of one blood line and give it to half a dozen others - how much better off would we be? Truth is, people are people and whatever leadership we put in place will always spawn some form of corruption. We have had great leaders in history who have ruled justly with an iron grip and then when they passed away were replaced by rampant corrupt phonies. Nothing is nailed down. Nothing is perfect and neither was it designed to be. Secret societies exist at all levels of society. Whether it be the so called illuminati or the freemasons, old boys network, the mafia, the elitist golf club, the close knit family unit who treat outsiders as second class members etc etc... We are One as they say.
Just when looked at individually, some parts seem more hopeless than other parts. But we are all essentially capable of the same.
Democracy - Scam or Non Scam?
Democracy and the Fragile Intellect
Democracy is a manifestation of the intellect. It is an intellectual construct devised to appease the people, at the same time as empowering them to concede power and wealth to those higher up the food chain.
Democracy is a balance of the rich mans desire for disproportionate wealth, power and control on one hand and the maintainence of the status quo within the masses.
Democracy has been placed at risk by the ever burgeoining desire of those entrusted to power and control.
The big questions is - will they remain to repair what they themselves have inevitably ruptured - or will they run for the higher ground when the system eventually runs aground?