Friday 3 November 2023

AI Talk: What is the Deep State?

An Artistic Response to my prompt by Midjourney.com

The term "deep state" is often used in political discourse to refer to a hypothetical or alleged secretive and influential group of individuals, often within a government or other powerful institutions, who are believed to be working behind the scenes to manipulate or control government policy and decision-making. The concept of the deep state typically implies that these individuals or entities operate covertly and independently of elected officials or the formal government structure.

It's important to note that the concept of the deep state is controversial, and its definition and implications can vary widely depending on the context and the beliefs of those using the term. Some common characteristics and aspects associated with discussions of the deep state include:

  1. Bureaucratic Influence: The deep state is often portrayed as consisting of individuals within the permanent bureaucracy of government agencies, such as intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and the military, who can exert significant influence over government policies.

  2. Continuity of Policy: Proponents of the deep state theory argue that it ensures the continuity of certain policies and agendas, regardless of changes in elected leadership.

  3. Lack of Accountability: Critics of the concept argue that the deep state operates without proper oversight or accountability, potentially undermining democratic processes.

  4. Conspiracy Theories: The term "deep state" is sometimes associated with conspiracy theories that allege a hidden, shadowy group of elites working to control governments and global events.

It's important to approach discussions of the deep state with critical thinking and skepticism, as the concept is often used in a highly political and ideological manner. In many cases, accusations of a deep state may be unsubstantiated or based on conjecture rather than concrete evidence.

It's also worth noting that the idea of a deep state is not unique to any particular country and has been used in various political contexts around the world. In some cases, the concept of a deep state can serve as a rallying point for those critical of government actions or policies. However, it remains a highly debated and contested concept in both academic and political discourse.

A thoughtful chat with ChatGPT.

Monday 30 October 2023

Israel's ruse de guerre?

Alien Killer Robots Reveals:

"Ruse de guerre" is pronounced as "rooz duh gair" in French. The "ruse" sounds like "rooz," and "guerre" sounds like "gair."

"Ruse de guerre" is a French term that translates to "war trick" or "stratagem of war" in English. It refers to a deceptive tactic or strategy employed in the context of warfare. Ruses de guerre are often used to mislead or confuse the enemy, gain a tactical advantage, or achieve military objectives through cunning or deceitful means.

These tactics can range from misleading enemy forces about troop movements to creating fake signals or distractions to divert attention. While ruses de guerre are a part of military history and strategy, they must be carried out within the bounds of international law and ethical principles governing armed conflict. Deliberate actions that result in unnecessary harm to civilians or violate the laws of war are generally considered illegal and unethical.

The specific scenario described here relates where a state deliberately exposes its vulnerabilities to provoke an enemy into taking action, with the ultimate goal of garnering support for the enemy's total annihilation, is a complex and extreme form of manipulation and deception in the context of military strategy. While there may not be a single term that perfectly encapsulates this strategy, it involves elements of psychological warfare, manipulation, and perhaps even self-sacrifice.

In historical contexts, this kind of strategy might be referred to as a "ruse de guerre" or "deceptive tactic." It involves tactics aimed at deceiving the enemy or manipulating them into taking actions that serve the manipulator's ultimate goals, even at the cost of significant harm to their own side.

Such tactics are highly unethical and controversial, as they involve significant loss of life and can lead to devastating consequences. They may also be seen as violations of the principles of proportionality and necessity in international humanitarian law. The use of such extreme tactics would likely result in significant condemnation by the international community.

The Honeypot (HoneyTrap)

The concept you're considering is where a state deliberately exposes vulnerabilities to lure an adversary into taking action, is somewhat similar to the cybersecurity practice known as a "honeypot." In cybersecurity, a honeypot is a system or network resource intentionally set up to attract and deceive potential attackers. The goal is to monitor their activities, learn about their tactics, and potentially gather evidence for legal action.

In your scenario, the state is essentially creating a "trap" to entice the adversary into taking actions that can then be used as a pretext for a military campaign. While the terminology may differ, the underlying idea of creating a deceptive situation to lure and manipulate an adversary has some parallels with the concept of a honeypot in cybersecurity.

However, it's important to note that the consequences and ethical considerations in the context of international relations and warfare are significantly more severe and complex than those in cybersecurity. Deliberately exposing a population to harm or using such tactics to justify war would raise serious moral, legal, and international political questions.


Examples of Ruse de guerre

There have been historical examples where a state's own soldiers or citizens were used as bait to provoke an enemy into taking a particular action. These tactics can be highly controversial and raise significant moral and ethical questions. Here are a few historical instances

  1. The Battle of Cannae (216 BC): During the Second Punic War, the Carthaginian general Hannibal used a tactic known as the "Cannae Tactic." He deliberately allowed his center to appear weak, tempting the Roman legions to advance and surround his forces. Once the Romans took the bait and committed their troops, Hannibal's forces encircled and defeated them in one of the deadliest battles in ancient history.


  2. The Alamo (1836): During the Texan War of Independence from Mexico, Texan defenders of the Alamo mission in San Antonio used the fortified position as bait to draw the Mexican army under General Antonio López de Santa Anna into a protracted siege. While ultimately overwhelmed, this tactic bought time for the Texan forces and contributed to their eventual victory in the war.


  3. The "Charge of the Light Brigade" (1854): During the Crimean War, a miscommunication led to British cavalry units charging directly into Russian artillery positions during the Battle of Balaclava. The soldiers followed orders, essentially serving as "bait" for the enemy.

These historical examples illustrate the use of tactics where a state or military commander deliberately entices an enemy into a particular course of action, often with the expectation of achieving a strategic advantage. However, it's essential to consider the ethical and moral implications of such tactics, particularly when they involve putting one's own soldiers or citizens in harm's way for strategic gain.

An excerpt from a brief discussion with an Alien Killer Robot codenamed ChatGPT.

Thursday 16 September 2021

Alien Killer Robots say thankyou to readers!

Just to say a big hello and thank you to our readers for your very interesting emails and comments. We thought we'd compile a list of some of the most well known brands and institutions that have visited this blog to read numerous articles. Please do keep coming back and let us know what you think.

Alien Killer Robots


This is a sample list of Brands and institutions who visit this blog.
The Pentagon
U.S House of Representatives
Goldman Sachs
U.S Government
U.K Cabinet Office
Microsoft
IBM
BBC
Synetrix Holdings Ltd
Commercial Properties
Disney
Performance Systems International
Mediaworks
Embark Corporation
Mccann-Erikson
JP Morgan Chase
Proctor and Gamble
Pfzier
Lockheed Martin
Cargill
Codemasters
Development Dimensions
Haymarket Publishing
Jessup & Lamont
Medtronic
N.A.S.A
Polo Ralph Lauren
Rohde & Schwarz
Ticketmaster
Checkpoint
Bose
BSkyB
Hathaway
Netscape Corp
Google Inc
Nat West
News International
Ogilvy & Mather
Stanford University
Willis Caroon
Vodafone
Apple Computers
University of ????? in the U.S, Europe and UK.
Finanical Times
ITV
American Express

Just some of the many brands and institutions that frequent Alien Killer Robots .

Sunday 4 July 2021

Do Facebook, Google, Youtube etc Support Truth or Belief of the World?

Alien Killer Robots reveals



I remember meeting this guy at the Institute of Directors who asked me if I knew the truth about the world. 

I said.. “Well, where do I start and proceeded to say, well, I believe….”

At which point he said “No, do you know the truth of the world? Not the belief of the world?”

I said.. “Well, where do I start and proceeded to say, well, I believe….”

He said, “You really have no idea have you?”

I said… “No, not really?”

I said.. “So, what is the truth of the world?”

He said, “Sorry, that is a secret and if you don’t know, that’s your problem.”

Therein lies the truth of the world. 

Belief is there, where the truth doesn’t tell. 

Where the truth is the domain of a few, hiding in clear view.

Only the Puppet Masters know the truth of the world.

Sunday 21 August 2016

What are Deep State Actors?


An Artistic Response to my prompt by Midjourney.com


A "deep state actor" typically refers to an individual or group of individuals within government or powerful institutions who are believed to operate behind the scenes and influence government policy, decision-making, or other significant aspects of governance. The term is often used in discussions related to conspiracy theories and the notion that there are hidden or covert forces at work within a government or bureaucracy.

In some cases, the concept of a deep state actor may imply that these individuals are working to pursue their own agendas, separate from the goals and objectives of elected officials or the formal government structure. The term is often used pejoratively and is associated with allegations of secrecy, manipulation, and a lack of transparency and accountability.

It's important to note that discussions involving deep state actors are often highly controversial and can vary widely in terms of the specific individuals or groups believed to be part of the deep state and the alleged actions they are undertaking. These discussions can be fueled by conspiracy theories and may lack credible evidence.

In democratic systems, government officials are typically subject to checks and balances, oversight, and accountability mechanisms to ensure transparency and prevent abuse of power. Claims of deep state actors often run counter to these principles, and it's important to critically assess such claims and examine the available evidence when discussing or evaluating allegations of hidden or covert influence within government or other institutions.