Why science was a bad idea? Einstein would have known it was the road to a self-harming world!

Brand Killer Robots reveal::

If i were to study the scientific disciplines i would surely spend my life looking through a microscope at illusions, rather than learning to know and see the world (unhindered by academia) for myself.

When the man who has cancer because of the stress caused by his job or the disgusting science-created waste around him needs help - who does he go to try and get well again? The same body of science who made him unwell in the first place.
The Science Doctors!

Scientists are people who think they are here to save the world from this or that - when in fact they are either causing more harm than good or are people who are trying to repair the holes created by other science madmen.

Human beings are rapidly defining themselves through the technology they use and the latest "this that or the other" science craze. We are following the lure of science - not the lure of God. We are defining ourselves as robotic Godlike alter-egos and not as Gods fragile, loving children.

One needs only to track the progression of mass killing weapon systems from the rock to the atom bomb to false wars and chemical technology, killer robots to understand what i mean. "The Flawed God image of Science".

Whilst humanity pretends God (cat) is not there, humanity (mice) will play at being God (cat), in his seeming absence. They really like to play the science game - amongst others.

Humanity has fallen into a childlike state where it has become frightened and directionless. Without a parent (God), the child becomes depressed and even falls into a state where it begins to self-harm.

Humanity self-harms - then it tries to fix it with the latest science and technology. How mad is that?

Science is an artificial, illusory device for self-harmers.

It took Einstein all his life to realise it. At which time, he found God.

Perhaps there is another way of looking at the Science Contribution question!

Brand Killer Robots reveal::

It may be that another way of considering the positive contribution of science vs. the negative contribution as thus: Science that ensures that mankind is not in control vs. Science that ensures that we never need to be in control. In other words, Science that ensures mankind is dependent upon it, versus science that can be applied such that mankind never needs to be dependent upon it.

You might call it "The Selfish, Conditional application of science", vs. "The Unselfish, Unconditional application of science".

An example of Science that ensures mankind is not in control (and thus is controlling of human beings) is todays poorly designed Internet computing interface, which cause people to (unwittingly) merge with their computers in a discontinous, disharmonic way causing regressive conditions that can turn them into zombies. See this article. Has your mind been damaged by poor computer interfaces? Perhaps you are an Internet Regressive?

An example of Science that does not place conditions on human beings, thus creating no such unhealthy dependency is Trevor Bayliss's clockwork radio for people in the 3rd world or water calibrated lens for glasses for the poor etc.

It is like anything in life. The Beauty is in the motive that intended the invention. If the motive for an invention smells, the result will smell too.

And vis-versa.

SCIENCE FOR SCIENCE SAKE IS EVIL

IMAGINATION WITHOUT REASON IS A MONSTEROUS THING!

Executive Desire: Just how far would you go to build a brand?

Brand Killer Robots reveal::

Someone once said "imagination without reason is a monsterous thing". Another saying that seems to parallel this is, "Science for science sake is evil".

Both sayings symbolise the age old problem of investment monies being spent on projects with flawed intentions.

Worse than this is the billions of dollars of funding being poured into gravely subversive projects like the US Military project which pioneered research into a "gay bomb" that makes enemy troops "sexually irresistible" to each other. Chemical warfare at its most subversive.

Analysis into the psychology of the R&D scientists behind such projects has revealed startling personality traits, that can only be described as cowardly, immature and high minded.

What appears on the surface to be a credible way to fight a war, where nobody needs to get killed, because they're all supposedly shacked up in an orgy, is in fact one of the most sinister kinds of psychological warfare known to man.

Question begs, how far would you or your executives go to build a brand that will place you right at the top in the history books? In 100 years from now, would you prefer your name to be mentioned in the same light as Bill Gates - or worst still, Genghis Khan!

Scientists invent GREEN food that cooks itself! Fact or Internet Fiction?

Brand Killer Robots reveal:

A group of scientists in a Florida have claimed they have invented a low energy polymer which once injected into food, cooks it from the inside. Apparently six of the scientists dined on a three course meal at the weekend which was cooked entirely by using the cunning formula. The scientists intend to launch a website soon where they will sell 100 polymer pellets for $5.00. Their site will feature a full length video of how a sausage can be cooked in 10 minutes, once injected with a polymer pellet. This patented technology has enormous applications in other areas of science, not to mention potential reduction in green house gases when consumers stop using ovens, barbecues and microwaves.

Now that's real innovation!